View Single Post
  #164   Report Post  
Posted to uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.tubes
Multi-grid Multi-grid is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 79
Default Output classes A and AB

On Nov 5, 3:37 pm, flipper wrote:
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 17:49:33 -0800, Multi-grid
wrote:


How would you keep the CCS working as a CCS when inductive kick
reverses polarity across it?


Rudy- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


So how much does the CT voltage to ground vary? I think not much, and
it would be fairly easy( though an exercise in heat management
perhaps) to keep from ever having it polarity reversed.


It is easy to call up 'inductive kick' when looking at voltage on an
OPT, but in this case I just don't see a mechanism. Both phases
conducting a little bit, CT voltage may try to move, but this is where
the last stage of the PS comes into play...and at twice the frequency
of the fundamental too.


If you interpose a CCS then there's nothing to keep it from moving.
Or, let's put it this way, If the CCS *does* anything then it's, by
definition, changing the voltage, and the induced voltage will swing
equally the opposite, but if the voltage is constant then it's not
doing anything so why have it there?



cheers,
Douglas- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


hey-Hey!!!,
You described an inductive kick that would reverse polarity across
this proposed current regulator. I took issue with that and said it
could easily be avoided.

So the CT voltage moves, that is proof the CCS is working. What's this
inductive kick comming from?
cheers,
Douglas