On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:15:25 +0200, Lionel
wrote:

Actually, it's almost a certainty that al-Zarqawi WAS in Iraq before
the invasion and received medical treatment.


As it was almost a certainty that Iraq was full of WMD ?

Of course not.

US haven't been able to supply the world *one* evidence of
the connection between Iraq and Islamist terrorists.

And yet, al-Zarqawi almost certainly *did* receive treatment in Iraq.
Lots of terrorists passed through the borders of that country, AS WELL
AS every other country in the region. The point is, this doesn't make
it "state-sponsored terrorism". After all, al-Qaeda had *operational
cells* right here in the US. Does that mean that the US is guilty of
"state-sponsored terrorism"?