Thread: Old faithful
View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Scott[_6_] Scott[_6_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 642
Default Old faithful

On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 6:58:25 AM UTC-7, Walt wrote:
On 10/16/2013 6:10 AM, Greg Wormald wrote:

In article ,


wrote:




http://www.stereophile.com/content/s...s-hft-and-feq-

transform-bose-wave-radio




Hmmm,




Linn has maintained for many years that *any* unpowered speakers in the


room has an effect on the sound--usually negative.




And there's a lot to that. An unpowered speaker is a passive radiator

that will vibrate in response to the sound field and re-radiate acoustic

energy thereby changing how things sound. It's just like the

sympathetic strings on a sitar or a hardanger fiddle.



Whether the effect is "better" or not is a matter of taste, but in

general engineers do not design speakers to be played in a room with

some unknown passive radiator so the smart way to bet is that it's not

an improvement.





At your typical big-box retail showroom where you might have 100 or more

passive radiators it's impossible to tell what a speaker might actually

sound like. Speakers that are bass deficient will be helped along by

all the passive radiators and resonating cabinets, while those with a

'proper' amount of bass will tend to sound muddy. I have a suspicion

that manufacturers of 'budget' systems take this into account at the

design phase.







Although I suppose if


the unpowered speakers were better than the powered ones the effect


could be positive.




Yeah, but in that case it would probably sound even better if the good

ones were powered and the lousy ones binned.







--

//Walt


Everything in a room affects the acoustics of the room. Speakers in the room actually don't have a particularly big effect. If the drivers are absorbing acoustic energy it's probably a good thing if it's audible at all.