[Michael Press]

In article ,
Michael Press wrote:

In article ,
Tim McNamara wrote:

In article ,
Michael Press wrote:

In article ,
Tim McNamara wrote:

In article ,
Michael Press wrote:

In article ,
Les Cargill wrote:

Stephen Cowell wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote ...

one instinctively wants the contrary to be true.

I'm pretty sure that sums it up, en toto, for the AGW crowd.
Thanks for being real. __ Steve .



If the only thing we can say is "we don't really know", then
... what?

That's always a start, but it makes for a short sorta
conversation.

Nobody repudiates the emails made public from CRU, East Anglia.
That is something we know. We also know that the emails contain
plans to subvert the scientific peer review process.

It's also interesting that the ire is directed at the victims of
theft, not at the sociopaths who did the thieving

Name the sociopaths who did the thieving.

Since they know their actions were illegal, they have seen fit to not
divulge their names.

I know very little about the release of the files.
Was a report of theft filed with the civil authorities?
My web search did not find anything.

We do know that Phil Jones is guilty of destroying
data that was not his to destroy, data that belonged
in the public domain.

So far one crime against CRU;
and as far as I know, nobody at
CRU has alleged a crime in regard
to the copied files.

I see that the Norfolk police are investigating the
unauthorized copying of the files.

--
Michael Press