The Vega and the Pinto
On May 8, 11:41�am, ScottW wrote:
On May 5, 10:05�pm, Boon wrote:
On May 5, 11:32�pm, ScottW wrote:
On May 5, 9:09�pm, Bret L wrote:
On May 4, 5:58�pm, Boon wrote:
On May 4, 1:13�am, Bret L wrote:
�Those were the primary brands' flagship small cars
Oh Jesus Christ. Someone mentions a Vega and you have to deliver one
of your internal Wikipedia entries.
You are so, so autistic.
�No, you are dense because you can not see the import (no pun
intended) of the progress of the American auto industry, and in turn
its impact on our society.
�He's all about appearances. First thing he said to me about his CD
player was the price tag
and then stupidly proclaimed, "They make a $20K model! �Imagine how
good it must sound."
Actually, I didn't say that. Naim didn't have a $20K player. So you're
lying about that.
� LoL, you claiming the facts would stop your mouth is a hoot.
That makes no sense in English, Lionel. Oops...I mean Scott.
And I'm pretty sure the first thing I did was play a lot of music. But
since it wasn't Genesis or Wishbone Ash, you couldn't concentrate.
�Actually you did play SEBTP and your anemic system completely failed
to convey any energy on FofF and you know I told you so.
I have no idea what SEBTP or FofF is. Speak English, idiot.
A more pompous audiophool you'll never find.
You're the one who said your Mitsubishi TT was "perfect on paper,"
�LoL. �You can't even fabricate a plausible lie.
Perhaps it's because I'm not lying.
�Nothing is perfect on paper but people should consider this.
Consider what?
You're actually better on usenet than in reality.
That makes no sense, either. Are you drunk today?
Trashing Orions, which you've never heard, simply because I own them
really shows the unbounded depth of your audiophoolery and your reason
for being on usenet.
I'm not trashing them because you own them. I'm trashing YOU for
buying a speaker based upon marketing copy and specs rather than
listening tests. We've also heard from one knowledgeable poster here
that they are unimpressive, and I've discussed them with another
knowledgeable person who says they are pretty good but WAY overpriced
for the money.
Anyone who buys into your occasional charade of being here for audio
discussions is an epic fool.
That rings false. We all know you are not here for audio discussions,
and you shrink from them when they occur. You also avoid civil
discussions, such as the one about literature, and you are only here
for two reasons: to spam the group with OT political posts and to
feign outrage whenever the discussions are less than civil.
You are here to troll, period. You are also functionally illiterate,
philosophically vapid and utterly unknowledgeable about audio. You are
exposed as a fool and a clown on a constant basis, and you have become
RAO's court jester. The fact that you're oblivious to your role here
is just icing on the cake.
Have another drink, Scott. You're not drunk enough yet to make sense.
|