View Single Post
  #18   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
Eeyore Eeyore is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,474
Default Explanation still required for triode superiority



Stuart Krivis wrote:

On 25 Sep 2006 12:51:12 -0700, "Bret Ludwig"
wrote:

Peter Wieck wrote:
Andrew Jute McCoy wrote its usual fallacious arguments:

Called "begging the question".

Triodes are neither "superior" nor "inferior" when it comes to
amplifiers. However, they do have many difficulties. Not the least of
which a

Flea Power.
Expensive to create.
Difficult to make operational (as your model so clearly illustrated).


Triodes are cheaper to build than beam power tubes of a given size,
simpler, and can be used for amplifiers of any size. Most 50 kW AM
broadcast transmitters had two triodes in their modulators giving 30 kW
audio power in Class B.


AM transmitters are a bit orthogonal to the topic at hand. :-)


The toobies don't care though !

Graham