View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Boon[_2_] Boon[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,425
Default In praise of the Marantz 7c

On Jun 16, 5:57*pm, Bret L wrote:
On Jun 15, 10:08*pm, Boon wrote:





On Jun 15, 9:06*pm, Bret L wrote:


*As far as high output impedance, it's fine with most all tube
amplifiers. If lower output impedance is needed, one refinement would
be to provide for transformers to be added via sockets as was done in
so much commercial gear. This would provide for true balanced 600 ohm
output so it could fit in tho the Real World of pro audio if needed
whilst not inflicting the considerable cost of the transformers on
users not needing them.


Why would you go to all of this bother when there are better products
available for far cheaper without butchering up an expensive old
Marantz?


*I wouldn't. I would build a new unit from scratch with the features I
wanted. A good DIYer could do it for maybe three hundred bucks in
parts, if he made his own step attenuator from switches and boards,
with a little scrounging.


Then again, the McIntosh C2200 is still a much more intriguing preamp
than the 7C.


Isn't it funny that Marantz, McIntosh and Luxman are making their best-
sounding equipment today, in 2010? A DIYer really can't match that
stuff.


*Bull****. Most of this stuff is so complicated that it would indeed
be infeasible for a DIYer to emulate, but that does not mean it's
good. Its very complexity with "features" like on-the-fly cartridge
loading via remote control introduce new issues.


Mmmm...okay. You start off with bull****, and then you go off on a
tangent that has nothing to do with what I said. News flash: when you
say "bull****," you usually have to follow that up with a contrary
statement. Or can we add Tourette's to your long list of psychological
disorders?

The stuff is good. I've heard it, and it's good. You probably have NOT
heard any of it, as you have been proven as a liar in this respect
more than once.


*Actually, my real hope is that commercial vendors would pick up on
the idea I put forth, and manufacturing them in some quantity the
price would come down. But the DIYer is the core true audiophile per
se, and is much to be celebrated. You don't have to build your own
stuff to be an audiophile but it is the most rewarding facet, in my
opinion, of the hobby.


The most rewarding facet of the hobby IS and WILL ALWAYS BE listening
to music, Jesus, you're a nutcase.

If your so-called audio ideas were worth anything, someone would be
doing it. Instead, we get a Bratzi wishlist that rarely reflects
anything that has to do with marketing, sound quality, user interface
or common sense.


*As far as the ARC SP-3a,

http://www.arcdb.ws/SP3/ARC_SP3A1_sc...archsp-3preamp

give useful info. It does seem to be a M7 derivative and to me that
just validates what I originally said. *As Simone Signoret said when
informed Yves Montand, her husband, had been putting it to
Marilyn.....


So now you've spun off into your own little world again. Figures.