nyob123 wrote
EddieM wrote
nyob123 wrote
EddieM wrote






Sniipp and disgreed to all the things you said.
Feel free to repaste though.



So, on the final ask, why don't you now answer the question. And that
rather simple question is :


What if Michael Fremer carried out a Subjective Evaluation between two
components of equal class in a local audio saloon over there in L.A.
and, towards the end, he came to conclude that there was a positive
subtle difference between the two, could this mean that he's hearing
things ?

In the situation you describe, very likely, but again, the same would be
true for anyone doing that kind of listening.

YOU mean to tell me that if Mr. Sean Olive carried out a Subjective
Evaluation between two components of equal class over there at Harman
and that, towards the end, if he came to conclusion that there was a
positive subtle difference between the two then, according to you, he is
very likely hearing things ?


Now you are changing the situation. Earlier you said the situation would be
an audio "saloon", at least that was the case you set up for Fremer.


Changing ? You wish.

I'm referring to the level of ability when listening to discern subtle
difference. That is, about the function and the ability to hear itself when
using the ears to hear differences -- which does not change for any
Subjective "listening" Evaluation.

So if Michael Fremer carry out a subjective listening Evaluation at audio
"saloon" and detect positive subtle diff, he is very likely hearing things.

But if Mr. Olive carrys out Subjective "listening" Evaluation at Harman
and detect positive subtle difference, he is likely to not hear things.


Could you describe to me the specific differences in their senses
leading you to validate that Michael Fremer is very likely hearing things?









I sniiiippp and disagree with all your comments hereafter.
But feel free to re-paste.