chung wrote:
Chelvam wrote:

"chung" wrote in message
...

snip..snip..

Are you interested in audible degradations, or any measureable
degradations?

Neither, just want to know why my player B (if you remember that posting)
sounds better than a more "modern" player. I want to know why I should be
satisfied with a $500 player over ,say a Esoteric.



So you are only interested in the sound differences, which are caused by
audible degradations. Seems like you should be doing controlled
listening tests then to verify that there are audible differences first.

My impression is that at this point he's mainly interested in offering what
he *thinks* is evidence in support for his sighted impressions, without much
understanding of the actual value or applicability of such evidence to his experience.

--

-S.
"We started to see evidence of the professional groupie in the early 80's.
Alarmingly, these girls bore a striking resemblance to Motley Crue." --
David Lee Roth