"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
newsaqGc.31138$XM6.12730@attbi_s53...

snip..snip..

If one need to study with the same level of expertise
in any topics mentioned in RAHE before they can put forward their opinion
then I say many must keep out of any discussion.

No problem with putting forward your opinion, but you must *listen* to
the rebuttals if you are to move the debate forward.

haven't I? google and see for yourself.


You have *no* proof that stray light affects lasers in commercially
available CD players. You are taking the authors comments *entirely*
out of context. Since you admit that you know nothing about physics,
please refrain from drawing these incorrect conclusions from technical
papers which you admit that you do not understand.

Mr.Pinkerton, have your read the article? The article was quoted to prove
that stray lights do exist and affect the laser. Is that so difficult to
understand? Prof Sukow said that stray light do affect laser. He also said
the project is useful, among others, music. Read. Sir.

If the technical paper was irrelevant then say so by backing up with some
explanation. You can talk why it is out of contect for the benefit of other
readers.


I have repeatedly emphasized that I know
nothing about Physics.

So why do you keep arguing on technical points with the physicists on
this newsgroup?

Maybe, to provide entertaiment for physicists after a hard day of DBT.