"Eeyore" wrote in
message
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Eeyore" wrote
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Eeyore" wrote:
Arny Krueger wrote:
I have more highly sensitive audio test gear by
accident then most people have on purpose. I probably
shouldn't admit this because it shows a certain kind
of carelessness.
Not more sensitive than Audio Precision or Prism
Sound.
Better than a Prism Sound ADA-8
Which isn't test equipment anyway.
Well, yes and no. With computer testing software, any
ADC-DAC can perform as some kind of audio test equipment.
Besides, I'm not the one who brought Prism up.
or an AP System One.
Better than a brilliant 20+ year old design ? No longer
in production btw. It's System 2 now. I'd like to know
by how much to be honest.
The LynxTwo runs neck-and-neck with an AP System 2,
according to its designer who of course has one.
So not actually 'better' then ?
Testing a LynxTwo with an AP2 won't give an answer either way, for obvious
reasons.
I seem to remember that the designer said that my
www.pcavtech.com results
for the LynxTwo were significantly better than what he got while measuring
it with an AP2.