[[email protected]]

On Tuesday, 7 January 2020 06:20:06 UTC+1, Here in Oregon wrote:
On Friday, September 16, 2005 at 12:49:00 PM UTC-7, Here in Oregon wrote:
Here in Oregon wrote:
Would anybody be brave enough to reveal what sample rate you are
recording with?

I'm just real curious what MOST people in this newsgroup are using with
all of these converters coming out coupled with the power of the new
computers and speed of the new hard drives.

24/44, 24/48, 24/96 16/22


Thanks for your input JP, Dave, Agent 86, Geoff, Mark, Scott, Paul,
Mike, Arny, Eric, Chris, RD, Fletch, Carey, David, Bob, Jonny, Danny,
Timo, and Les.

The consensus out of roughly twenty respondents....

11 are using 24/44.1
3 are using 16/44.1
3 are using 24/96
1 is using 24/48
1 is using 16/48
1 is using both 16/44.1 and 24/96


Mike Rivers wrote: Will you publish the result of this poll?


Only in the "New England Journal of Medicine"


Kidding!

Thanks to all the participants,... I can now sleep at night.

Hey guys, it has been 15 years since I took the last poll and I wanted to ask if you would chime in on what bit depth and sampling rate you are primarily using now e.g., 16/44, 24/44, 24/48, 24/96, 24/192, tape?

I would really appreciate your participation in this poll and as before I will post the results.

24/44.1, I don't do video but if I did 24/48, very rarely double those if I am intending analysis or special processing... though all my plugins oversample (I *think* all...)