*In other words, the footnotes must go! If there's a problem with
the answer to a question, it should be rewritten. I suggest either
having someone with expertise in that particular area rewrite it,
paraphrasing literature in that area, or doing google searches of
R.A.C. to find what the general concensus was for an answer to that
question. *
My plan is not to have the final product replete with footnotes, but to
use this as a tool for moving the future FAQ to a healthy modified
version. The debate as to which questions need to be added and which
answers need to be redacted, needs a method to be organized. First
suggestions need to be recorded in an organized manner. It's not going
to happen over night, but with a little effort, it can happen.

I see. Not a bad idea after all, then. Good luck!