On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:52:55 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:36:53 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:18:06 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message


On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 08:53:23 -0400, in rec.audio.opinion Arny
wrote:


Please explain why you want to prattle on about your use of
illegal drugs?

You mean about your *false claim* of the above subject?

No, about your gratuitous mention of them, Weil.

Hardly gratuitious when comparing *your* claim about potentially
actionable libel from someone else to your potentially actionable
libels against me.

You seem to be very unclear about what constitutes a provable or
disprovable claim.

Let's take the claim that you have never taken an illegal drug, or
for that part, that I have never taken an illegal drug. Where does
one start when proving or disproving the claim? What chemical test
would be good evidence in court? Who can testify to every moment of
my life?

Weil declines to answer any of these simple relevant questions in his
efforts to continue to publicze the details of his use of illegal drugs

You can try to change the subject all you want, Arnold.

Now, let's take the claim that my family put me in a Michigan
hospital against my will. That takes a court order, and courts keep
long-lasting records of their actions.

There's no difference in terms of what an actionable libel claim is.

Ignorance even the basics of law, noted. Every court wants to have cases
that can be decided based on verifiable facts.

And if you make a public claim that can't be verified, BOOM, the
hammer gets dropped on you.

Can you see the difference, Weil?

Can you?

Yes. Having a verifiable fact at hand, makes things a lot easier to take to
court.

Actually, no. If that were true, you wouldn't have an "actionable
claim", now would you? That is, unless there's some fire behind the
smoke.

No, I didn't think so!

Thanks for sharing...

Thanks for polluting RAO again and thanks for your unwillingness to
"stop the madness".

Weil, who is it that brought this madness about your use of illegal drugs
up, this morning?

Ahhh, so now you admit that your prior claims were madness. Thank you
for that. I'd rather an explicit, "I'm sorry" though.