"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


Yappity-yappity-yap.

I just read Sanders' latest salvo at you in which he claimed that at
a
social dinner, you launched into a rant about Stereophile not doing
blind testing of equipment.

If that's true -- and I accept it at face value based on the little I
know of you -- I am absolutely certain that any time I spent in your
company would be wasted and a total bore.

If you accept anything Sanders says at face value you're much stupider
than I thought.

You don't really "think", anyway, so that's not much of an insult.

But explain this contradiction in Stereophile.

The weight of evidence tilts the scale toward Sanders' version.

He spent at least 10x the time on his "joke" than I did on
stating my view on Stereophile reviews.
You can let him spin that into a rant if it suits your
purpose. Truth does not often suit your purpose.

ScottW