[Jerry Avins]

Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
Jerry Avins wrote:
Floyd L. Davidson wrote:

...

Nyquist rate:
The reciprocal of the Nyquist interval, i.e., the
minimum theoretical sampling rate that fully
describes a given signal, i.e., enables its
faithful reconstruction from the samples. Note: The
actual sampling rate required to reconstruct the
original signal will be somewhat higher than the
Nyquist rate, because of quantization errors
introduced by the sampling process.
It does not say what you claimed it does.
Do you buy the "because clause? I don't.

"The actual sampling rate required to reconstruct the
original signal will be somewhat higher than the Nyquist
rate, because of quantization errors introduced by the
sampling process."

All qualified practitioners will recognize that as wrong. Are you qualified?

All qualified practitioners will recognize that you are wrong, and
obviously unqualified.

It is in fact a correct statement. Do you know what quantization
distortion is?

Yes. How is it related to sampling rate? Why would sampling exactly at
the Nyquist rate be adequate if the quantization were fine enough? Don't
you read the crap you cut and paste?

Don't answer. I'm through.

Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯