"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
groups.com...

Sander deWaal wrote:
Lionel said:

Quite predictably, Loionel (if that is his real name - lol)

No, "Loionel" isn't my real name. ;-)

Do you like cats?

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

Mostly, he likes to imitate Krueger by nit-picking about typographical
errors.

There seems to be alot of that going around, not confined to Krueger.


Only in your imagination, or rather, your need to lie about this fact.
You and
Krueger out of an RAO population of how many? Is this a form of "New
Math" in
which you equate the number "2" with "alot"?

Inabilty to recognize there might be a difference between people and
incidences, noted.


For the record, "alot" is not a word, except in McKelvy's stupidity-based
"Kroocabulary" (not a word, but accurate description of what's behind
McKelvy's
slavish devotion to defending RAO"s most hated poster).

An opinion you get to have.

Just like he likes to imitate Krueger by starting attack
threads.

You're too humble, you know you like it too.


Another McKelvy lie. I only start attack threads when I'm attacked in
similar
threads, as your buddy, Lionel, has recently done.

Oh well, as long as you have a good reason for doing the stuff you criticise
others for.


Someday, when he grows up (if that ever happens - lol), he
hopes to be known as "Lionel "the Krueger-lover" Chapuis AKA His
Master's Voice)

When he get that, where would he call you to let you know? :-)



It will never happen. The same telephone number that Leslie Van Vreeland,
Steve Zipser, Graham (The Devil), Jim Sanders, and many other RAO callers
with
integrity and brains have called over the years. A number deliberately
designed to not respond to yuur calls since you thought you could once
again
lie to RAO's many readers by making a phony proposal that nobody but you
beleived you would ever honor.

You know what they say about assumptions.
There was noting phony about it, it's easy, doesn't require you to speak to
me and assuming you have caller ID allows you to know where I called from.


Here's a *real* proposal, just to prove your dishonesty. I can send you
an
email with my telephone number on it (since I'm not in the habit of
advertising
on RAO), and specify a time for you to call that number.
The number will be answered by an answering machine with my voice on it
and you
can then leave a message on the machine with your pbone number and other
information you care to pass on on that tape recording.

Doesn't work for me if the phone number is not listed in information as
belonging to you.

I will then proceed to
announce on RAO that you have done this. As per your stated promise (not
that
anybody believes it), you will then issue a concrete retraction concerning
your
false statements about my professional identity and activities, and make
no
further mention of my name in any future posts - irrespective of what they
do
or do not say about Krueger or anybody else. Let's see if you have the
integrity (douibtful) or honesty (even more doubtful) to honor promises
you've
made.




Let's see if you can comply with the other criteria about a number that is
listed as belonging to Bruce J. Richman.