[David Nebenzahl]

[replying to Dick Pierce's post which my ISP didn't pick up for some reason]

"Dick Pierce" wrote in message
...

Your entire basis for argument leads us to one of
several conclusions, none of which are particularly
good for you:

1. You are well-intentioned but technically naive,
you've come to a conclusion based on your rather
entrenched position and you can't or won't take
the time to study the flaws in your understanding
of the physics, acoustics and basic mathematics
of the realm,

2. You believe you have discovered some miraculous
breakthrough, something that the industry with a
collective experience measuring thousands of years
have utterly failed to grasp, and you will NOT be
detered from your mission, ignoring, of course, the
very real possibility you could be dead wrong and,
of course, facts and reality be damned,

3. You're a complete troll: you have no interest in
in anything approaching a constructive discussion:
your only interest is in being disruptive. You have
wandered in to a technical forum and, lacking any
real substantive contribution, want to make your
mark by, instead, peeing on the furniture.

So in the interest of being charitable here, I propose that the OP (the
nym-shifter) actually try this scheme, and report the results back here.
Since we've been totally ineffective at trying to dissuade him/her from
his/her fixations, the only thing to do is to set it up and put it to
the test.


--
Who needs a junta or a dictatorship when you have a Congress
blowing Wall Street, using the media as a condom?

- harvested from Usenet