[MiNe 109]

In article ,
flipper wrote:

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:05:29 -0600, MiNe 109
wrote:

In article ,
flipper wrote:

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:06:18 -0600, MiNe 109
wrote:

In article ,
flipper wrote:

I'm not addressing that point.

How typical of AGW worshippers to 'not address the point'.

How typical of deniers to play meaningless word games.

'Addressing the point' is not a word game but what you just tried to
do is.

Yes, it was a simple substitution. However, there are terms for holding
someone responsible for arguments not made.

As I said earlier, you do not get to decide what *my* points are.

Why not? You've shown a willingness to make my points for me.

Stephen