[Jerry Peters]

In rec.audio.tech MiNe 109 wrote:
In article ,
flipper wrote:

With your logic drug company testing would be to throw away all the
failed results, dead bodies, and placebo effects and declare the drug
'safe': we throw away data that doesn't work.

I explained the tree-ring thing in a reply to your wing man: it's
possible the tree-ring data has diverged due to anthropogenic CO2. The
tree-rings have been shown to be accurate for the last millenium or so
before that.

Stephen

Note the words "it's possible", not a very definitive point, is it?
Probably explains "hide the decline", he didn't want most of us to
notice that tree-ring data might not be all that accurate.

So once again: if there's an unexplained divergence after 1960, how do
we know there's not one or more divergences in the prior 1000 years?

Jerry