digital photography vs. digital audio
"Boris Lau" wrote in message
Arny Krueger wrote:
I've never seen a photograph of something with substance
that could be confused with a view of the origional
object, after a close inspection.
Have you heard an audio recording of something with
substance (e.g. singer, instrument) that could be
confused with listening of the original object after a
close inspection? I haven't...
I have been fooled, and I've fooled others. The basic trick i've used is to
make a good close-miced recording of a small group performing in a room, and
then play the recording back in the same room from pretty good speakers in
the same general vicinity as the origional performance.
|