View Single Post
  #62   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design
Michael A. Terrell Michael A. Terrell is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 318
Default Convention for naming for audio adaptors and leads


john wrote:

On Wed 25-Mar-2009 18:06, Michael A. Terrell
wrote:


john wrote:

RCA probably developed several connectors. If one says "RCA"
then I imagine that is just a short form of "RCA phono".



Then show us another connector from RCA that became common
as dirt.


That's my point too! .... that the "RCA phono" connector was so
common that it could be called "RCA" almost unambiguously.



Do whatever you want, but some of us stick to proper names. I deal
with vendors who use the proper nomenclature when I need parts. I think
that if they don't know the proper name, they don't really know what
they are selling.


On the other hand, "RCA" probably wouldn't be the correct formal
name if there were other RCA connectors.



--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html

Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white listed, or I
will not see your messages.

If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm