16 bit vs 24 bit, 44.1khz vs 48 khz <-- please explain
wrote in message
Justin Ulysses Morse wrote:
While it's true that the additional bits tack your extended
resolution onto "the bottom" of the dynamic range, it clearly
increases the resolution at all levels. You can have a -100dB
component to a -1dB signal, and you still want to hear it.
Is the ear even capable of hearing the -100 component against the much
louder -1? I thought masking prevented this.
The threshold of reliable perception of spurious signals and noise is on the
order of from -60 to -70 dB when the music has reasonably sustained peaks at
0 dB.
This is one reason why it's fair to say that the practical benefits of
going past 16 bits are non-existent at high levels.
|