Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:21:50 +0000, Don Pearce did catÂ*:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:02:37 -0700 (PDT), ChrisCoaster
wrote:
On Nov 1, 3:41Â*pm, (Don Pearce) wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 12:31:25 -0700 (PDT), ChrisCoaster
wrote:
On Oct 31, 10:53Â*am, ChrisCoaster wrote:
Seriously!
Aside from 1/2hour episodes of "The Shadow" or "Great Gildersleeve"
radio shows, is the greatest thing to happen in the 1990s totally
passe?
My personal mp3 download minimum is 192kbps. Â*For rips - 256 if it's
poppy stuff, 320 for jazz, classical, and stuff I just can't live
without. Â*
-ChrisCoaster
________________
Come on folks - this isn't a post about lacy lingerie or cleavage!
Seriously, I'm still finding a lot of "128"s on the web(mp3s encoded
at 128kbps). Â*Shouldn't such a low bitrate be outlawed?
-CC
Try encoding with AAC at 128kbits/sec and prepare to be pleasantly
surprised. MP3 is SO last millennium.
d- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
_____________
Will iPods and other mp3 players be able to play them?
iPods will. As for MP3 players - it depends.
and the same question proved to be a problem for Vorbis/ogg, a
sad story sometimes is the Story of audio ;-(