wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ink.net...


The people endorsing ABX have results to show for their efforts. The
other side has.....?



.... a system they enjoy listening through.

But it might be possible to have the smae sound for less money or it
may
be possible to have a better one. Likely as not given that there are
so
few differnces, no change would occur.

"Better" is in the eye of the beholder. "Better" is what you think
sounds best. I prefer whatever sounds best when I am listening for
enjoyment,
not what sounds best when I am engaged in a rigid test environment.

How do you know if you've never bothered to try?

Suppose for the sake of discussion that you found that you could save
several hundred dollars by doing DBT? Wouldn't it be better to have the
same sound from your electronics and have extra money left over to put it
wher it really counts, with a better quailty speaker system?

With the fraudulent form of ABX currently being pushed by liars, poseurs,and
pseudoscientists, it would only cause the listener to miss the genuine
difference that mean all the difference in hifi.
We cannot accept your "sake of discussion" request, because you are a known
liar, arguing in bad faith on behalf of the notorious BAD SCIENTIST and
poseur, Arny Krueger. To accept your request would be a disservice to the
audio community.
Therefore, your request is DENIED.