Henry Pasternack's Norton triode model???
"Andre Jute" wrote in message oups.com...
[Deleted]
Typos are a nuisance, but there's enough context in the rest of the paragraph to
figure out exactly what I mean. The only thing attacking me personally shows
is that you have nothing worthwhile to say.
A hundred years ago this subject was cutting edge physics. Most readers don't
have the background to follow the arguments. I know you don't.
If you want to quibble over details, be my guest. I entered the discussion to
respond to Patrick, not to discredit you -- you take care of that on your own.
I feel sorry for Phil, who tried hard to make a positive contribution, spoke his
mind, and got a heap of trash talk from you in return. I would say you ought
to be ashamed of yourself, Andre, but I know you're not capable of it.
I didn't invite your commentary and I'm not interested in your sleazy opinion.
Go away.
-Henry
|