On 14 Sep 2005 02:53:36 GMT, "Harry Lavo" wrote:

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On 12 Sep 2005 03:58:58 GMT, "Harry Lavo" wrote:

Please note that at least some of these "mover and shaker" scientists
specifically exploring the reproduction of music (as opposed to codecs
and
telephone transmission) give great attention to physical and
psychological
comfort, eschew short snippet testing in favor of comparative-monadic,
and
have found they can validate differences when a conventional
short-snippet
test resulted in a "null".


Please list them.

Tsutomu Oohashi, Emi Nishina, Manabu Honda, Yoshiharu Yonekura, Yo****aka
Fuwamoto, Norie Kawai, Tadao Maekawa, Satoshi Nakamura, Hidenao Fukuyama,
and Hiroshi Shibasaki

Ah yes, the notorious Pioneer-backed attempt to prove that we really
need 100kHz bandwidth. Got any Europeans or Americans?

Actually, Stewart, if you looked further you would find that Oohashi and
many of his team have been doing work in psychoacoustics and neurophysiology
for many years and are well published. Put you chauvinism aside, why don't
you.

Not chauvinism, simply that you are reeling off one single team whose
commecially sponsored work remains uncorroborated. Hardly 'movers and
shakers'.

Moreover, your assertion that Pioneer funded the research is just that, an
assertion. No proof has ever been offered or cited. It may or may not have
been funded by a consortium...but if so, that is common practice in many
contries, including Great Britain and the United States.

Nice sidestep, Harry...........

Was JJ's work at
AT&T invalid because it was privately funded? The validity depends on how
well the study was done and the results, peer-reviewed.

Quite so - and the Oohashi results remain uncorroborated.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering