Note to Clyde
On 26 Noi, 19:38, George M. Middius wrote:
Wacky Sacky said:
Don't bother.
I will bother.
You're self-bothering.
You are in need of some help.
How considerate of you. When it comes to your help, I'd prefer you focus on
a couple of outstanding questions that you've been weaseling away from for
months. First, when you were squealing in terror about SSM during your
colloquy with Jenn, you pretended not to understand anything she said. I'm
sure you can do better once you're out of Scottie's orbit.
That is not a question
Second, you once claimed, in apparent seriousness, that Witless is "quite
intelligent". I asked you then, and I'm asking you now, if you truly believe
that, how do you explain his simpleton act on Usenet?
that is your characterization, so you can try to explain it.
It would be much more fruitful for you to clean up your own messes than to
run interference for poor, dumb Scottie Witlessmongrel.
My postings about your so-called question are about you and your
question, not about Scott.
|