[Audio Empire]

On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:14:43 -0700, Gary Eickmeier wrote
(in article ):

"Sebastian Kaliszewski" wrote in message
...
Audio Empire wrote:

Please show me some formal studies that back up this "notion" because my
experience with home Hi-Fi tells me that this is wrong. You're going to
have to prove it with more than just endless reiteration

Excatly my issue with Mr Eickmeier's theory -- it lacks physical and
psychoacoustical explanation. And/Or a support off a set of properly
controlled listening tests (there is just one result and only against some
narrow set of speakers -- a set of Linkwitz Orions -- i.e. dipoles, and
some more-or-less generic set with some experimantal(?) digital room
correction).

This is misconceived badly enough to require a whole new thread. The
physical explanation is The Big Three. The psychoacoustic explanation is the
first thread, What Can We Hear? where I talked in great detail about the
major aspects of sound that we can hear, concluding that the spatial
characteristic is the main stumbling block and describing what we can hear
about a speaker/room interface.

Gary Eickmeier




Like I said, reiterating endlessly, your personal "notions" about sound does
nothing to help validate them into actual "theories". It's going to take some
actual science back by some actual theoretical research. This means quoting
peer-reviewed papers that are generally available, ideally with URL links. so
they can be read in context by all interested parties.