"ric" wrote in message ...

As usual, your reply has *nothing* to do with what I said. I said new
hybrid SACD releases outnumber non hybrid SACD releases, contrary to
what you wrote. Your commenting on the number of non SACD releases is
about as relevant as comparing it to DVD releases. Totally irrelevant.
You were wrong, so you changed the subject. Typical.

No ric, I was mocking your previous statement. Gee, did that need to be
spelled out for ya...


Again, irrelevant to the point being discussed. You said that the
backwards compatibility of SACDs depends on if the SACD
"catches on to the public at large." That's what my above reply
is about. Again, you were wrong so you
attempted to change the subject. How transparent.

No ric. You keep talking about "backwards compatibility". I'm talking
about *marketing* it to the public. I'm talking about 'apples', you're
talking about 'oranges'.

Jesus you're an even bigger dumbass than I first thought.


Uh-oh, more ad hominem attacks from ric.

No, just a fact. When you make no sense (which is often), I'm not
gonna sugar coat it.

Did I hurt your touchy-feely feelings, ric? Aww... Me so saw-wee....

*YOU'RE* the one moaning about attacks, not me. What a moron.

Gee maybe I should've put it in CAPS on it and made it sound more
melodramatic for ric. Do you think that would make me sound like I was
"moaning" for ya?

Get a ****ing clue, dude....


I would rather have a SACD compatible player and have the CHOICE to
listen to SACD recordings when available than have a standard CD
player and NOT have that choice. Now, twist that around to mean
something completely different.

But I don't need that choice, ric. That's a choice for audiophiles who
know that the only way their precious format will survive is to
piggyback it
on to the CD format. It can't stand on it's own an *you* know it.

Again, this has *NOTHING* to do with your erroneous statement that
getting a SACD compatible player limits one's choice. Again, you try
to change the subject because your original statement was erroneous
and could not be defended.

Sure it does. With SACD-only CDs, your choices are limited. With only
2,000 titles available, I don't see how the **** you can deny that. Unless
your head is stuck so far up your ass in denial that you can't pull it
out...


Notice a pattern here?

Anybody else hear banjos?

Whatsa matter, ric? Forgot to take your medication?

Or is it only the SACD player you forgot to turn off....