Note to Clyde
On Nov 26, 5:37*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 26 Noi, 11:02, George M. Middius wrote:
Don't bother.
I will bother.
You are in need of some help.
You only posted your message three times, in three different threads.
That's not enough to get the word out.
to help you along, I'll post it here, just
in case anybody missed your three earlier identical posts.
I'll do this for a while, but in the
long rune, you might want to rent a borg.
George says:
"To His Magnificent Dumbness, duh-Scottie of San Diego:
Arnii Krooborg has proven himself the worst excuse for a self-
described
"christian" in the history of Usenet. Of course, we all know the
filthy
Beast is off his rails, as in not all there, looney-tunes, bazonkers,
etc.
By contrast, you appear to be sane, albeit a bit slow. I would like to
ask
you, as a lifelong and devout Lutheran, why you condone Bratzi's
racist
rants.
By way of explaining your responsibility to deliver a rationalization
for
your approval of RAO's little Nazi bedbug, I point out that you have
adopted
the Krooborg's "debating trade" religion. Therefore we Smart Guys
demand
that you conform to the least possible level of integrity in the
performance
of the "debating trade". That means that you, like your hideous,
misbegotten
idol Arnii Kroofeces, are required to utter frequent denunciations of
every
opinion and every post of which you disapprove. Lacking such overt
denunciations, your allegiance to the "debating trade" indicates your
acceptance of such posts.
You've never been shy about tattling on me or Shhhh to Mistress Jenn.
Nor
have you been reticent about launching volley after volley of
impotent
puff-ball insults at John Atkinson, whose only crime, by the
'evidence'
you've cited, is drawing breath. Since you are not obviously insane,
you
bear the obligation to denounce racism and other bigotry, else
otherwise
your fealty to those antihuman values be presumed as dominant. Get on
the
stick, you filthy mutt! "
glad to be of assistance, George.
Learn how to format then. LOL!
|