I said I would not ask for or accept them, I didn't say I didn't want
them. I tried to take them on already and Ian ignored my emails. Now if
I tried, considering the festering mess this issue has taken on, it
would be used to beat the issue to death. The issue is not that I
become the maintainer; the issue is for someone to that will actively
try and improve it to become the maintainer -- as was the case when it
was created. The FAQ needs to be updated. It did not have an active
maintainer pursuing its improvements. I think the last update being
over FOUR YEARS ago proves my point.

It's updated whenever someone sends him an update. If you took over, do you
think people would come out of the woodwork to submit an update?

Or are you suggesting Ian submit one himself? And if you took over, would
that mean we'd have to look forward to updates by Lee?