[GeoSynch]

Marc Phillips, aka Vinyl Anachronist formerly of TONEAudio, argues with himself
(again):





Let's take a careful look at what GeoSynch is repeating over and over
about me:

"Marc Phillips, aka Vinyl Anachronist formerly of TONE Audio [sic],
argues with himself
(again): "

There's no such thing as TONE Audio. I've never worked for TONE Audio.

" No one agrees with you there. And apparently no one cares,
because the
focus of going away from you and back to Scott!
What a train wreck of a sentence by the bumbling Buffoon.
I was just trying to make you feel more at home."

I'm not sure why you would include this exchange, since it's not
related. I guess in your addled, confused state, you thought it would
help if you included a typo from me. Too bad you committed a typo just
before it. LoL! I've never seen someone shoot themselves in the foot
more than you.

"Marc Phillips stated "Really? You don't exist here solely to attack
others?" in
this post (towards end of post):
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...f2fa936b54f86d

I use his quote (clearly denoted as such) when responding to him:
"Your deflective "point" ("Really? You don't exist here solely to
attack
others?") was irrelevant to the question of what those so-called
"behavior
therapists" would make of your flamefest compulsion. This is something
that you
yourself can not face, because it causes you - what's that
psychological term
for it ... oh yes - cognitive dissonance."
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...b285a3ba050ae7

Engulfed in red-misted frenzy, Marc Phillips does not even recognize
his own
words being quoted and commences arguing with himself:
" Your deflective "point" ("Really? You don't exist here solely to
attack
others?")

No, I don't. Do you see me attacking Shhh!? Jenn? Clyde? George?
Anyone else here who actually discusses audio?"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...98fe9665544c15

Marc Phillips, who calls himself Vinyl Anachronist, is clearly a
deranged
lunatic who cannot recognize what he himself recently has written and
begins to
strenuously argue with himself."

Wrong. When you threw my words in my face, it was a call to answer
them directly. I see nothing wrong with my response, and it's
definitely not me arguing with myself. You're clearly wrong on this
point.

"Nor is this the first time:

Marc Phillips previously wrote (in middle of first paragraph): "You
haven't
offered one shred of proof..."
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...a9356ea00c1ed1

My response to that post:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...dfe2b63016b13f

Marc Phillips, deranged lunatic, then proceeds to argue with himself:
" You haven't offered one shred of proof

I've offered plenty of proof."
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/e9a03cec069bcf50"

This is a little trick that you like to play that never quite pans out
for you. You include someone else's words in your response and then
start cackling that they're responding to themselves when they address
the point. That's what's happening here. If you throw someone's words
back at them, it's YOUR response. They are then responding to your
claim, not their own.

That's a clear, concise explanation...something you've been unable to
do in weeks, even months. Your point was just completely destroyed.

LoL!

"Marc Phillips psychotic Usenet behavior brought unwanted attention to
his
employer's notice, who implored Marc Phillips to stop posting on
Usenet
newsgroups, which was the basis for this short-lived swan song:
"I bid you all farewell."
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...45ecc3f4cdcf33
"

And then more facts came to light:

1. It wasn't Bret, but Arny who emailed Jeff.
2. Jeff was at first concerned and took Arny seriously until he read
some of Arny's posts and figured out he was a Usenet troll. Several
people (including JA) then sent Jeff an email explaining who Arny was
and that I did not make any death threats.
3. Arny kept contacting Jeff. Jeff told him not to email him anymore.
Jeff sent me copies of Arny's emails and his responses. I then
forwarded them to a select group of people here so if Arny tried to
lie about what Jeff said, they would know for sure that he lied.
4. Jeff explained to Arny that as an independent contractor, he has
absolutely no say over what I did on Usenet. Jeff never once told me
to stop posting on RAO. Not once.
5. Several people here asked me not to leave.
6. I got Arny to leave RAO for good. That changed the RAO landscape
for the better, so I returned.

So you really don't have a point here either. I don't think you ever
really have a point. You just think that rabid proclamations can
substitute for good old-fashioned logic and reason.

"Surely Jeff Dorgay and the staff of TONE Audio [sic] were mightily
relieved when Marc
Phillips left that publication and moved from Washington to Texas."

Why don't you ask him? I still consider Jeff a good friend and talk to
him all the time. Why do you instantly assume that when I left, it was
under acrimonious conditions? Is it because you have never left an
employment position under pleasant circumstances? How many times have
you been fired? I've never been fired once in my entire life. Every
time I leave a position, it is to accept something better. While I
miss writing for TONE (and all the cool audio equipment I got to play
with), I made a sound business decision.

So, in other words, none of your claims hold up. I'm not surprised. As
an autistic person, your methods for reasoning aren't particularly
sound. Notice how no one is sticking up for you? Notice how no one
agrees with you that I'm deranged and arguing with myself? Notice how
no one is touching you with a ten foot pole? You've become just
another Usenet whackjob like Bwian and Bobo. Your "campaign" against
me is falling on deaf ears since most people ignore you and killfile
you. And if someone takes the time to read your silly diatribe,
they'll think you're just another big Internet loser.

That's because you are. LoL!

It's been conclusively proven

No, it hasn't.

There isn't a person on the planet who thinks so other than you. And
you're autistic.

Yes, it has. It most certainly has.

You and your band of Bozos may choose not to believe it but that doesn't alter
fundamental reality.