AudioBanter.com - View Single Post

wrote:
chung wrote:
bob wrote:
wrote:

snip all

Shorter Scott:
1. To me, the euphonic distortions of digital are beautiful.
2. Lots of recordings are badly made.
3. It's all digital's fault.

bob

Add (4):

4. Any attempt to summarize my (Scott's) position by objectivists will
fail.

So far they have failed.

What makes you think we were trying?

I find it odd that such a smart group of
people would feel compelled to summarize a *summary* of my views. Why
can't you guys just take *my* summary for what it is?

Because it was too long to read?

Why do you guys
continue misrepresent my views? Do you not understand them or are you
misrepresenting them on purpose? Like I said before, in any debate or
disagreement, if one side can accurately represent the opposing view
(like I did with the objectivist POV)

Yeah, right. Try again, some time.

but the other side can't or wont
do the same, it speaks volumes over who has the better grasp of the
merits of the issue. If you can't undestand or acknowledge my position
on this issue you can't begin to make any kind of meaningful or
valuable critique of it. So lets see if you can take the first step and
do as good a job of stating my position as I did of stating the
objectiist position in your own words. Should be easy since it is right
there in front of you.

My point was not to summarize you. It was simply to note that you
offered nothing new, and that once again you appear to be someone who
likes the *sound* of vinyl and needs somehow to rationalize or justify
that preference. I'm surprised that I have to spell this out for you.

bob