[Luxey]

понедељак, 19. октобар 2015. 23.57.55 UTC+2, None је написао/ла:
"Peter Larsen" wrote in message
news:56251d35$0$23209
Left Right
Min Sample Value: -32768 -32768
Max Sample Value: 32767 32767
Peak Amplitude: 0 dB 0 dB
Possibly Clipped: 12 4
DC Offset: 0 0
Minimum RMS Power: -81.67 dB -83.41 dB
Maximum RMS Power: -4.76 dB -4.3 dB
Average RMS Power: -9.83 dB -10.02 dB
Total RMS Power: -9.33 dB -9.54 dB
Actual Bit Depth: 16 Bits 16 Bits

Using RMS Window of 300 ms

- Peter Larsen

Four lines, at least, of meaningless nonsense. "RMS Power" =
meaningless nonsense. The "DC Offset" figure is probably as
meaningless as the RMS Power gibberish.

I think we should ease a bit on this. I also think (RMS) POWER in this context
is meaaningless, but I also think most people arround here have good idea about what it's supposed to mean here.
Why did makers of that software choose to use word "power" at "powerless"
place, well ...