[KH]

On 11/10/2013 11:47 AM, news wrote:
Audio_Empire wrote:

This equine isn't merely deceased, it is badly decomposed. I suggest
you guys stop trying to convince each other and just agree to
disagree. Other than this one comment, I'm going to sit this one out.

Thank you George. I know it's hard.

Thanks in very large part to a lack of explanatory clarity, and reliance
on obfuscatory analogies of questionable cogency to support your model.

I just wonder if you all understand what
makes a Martin Logan sound different from a WAMM, a Quad sound different
from a Behringer, or yes, a 901 sound different from everything else. What
physical quality of speakers are you hearing there? Which one is better, or
best? Are there aspects of speaker design that you haven't yet considered?

And once again I have to wonder if you truly understand how arrogant
this position appears? Denigration of the intellectual prowess of all
dissenters is absolutely guaranteed to fail if conversion of the
'unwashed' is your aim.

I honestly find it difficult to understand why you persist in this vein.

snip

Keith