View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Harry Lavo Harry Lavo is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,243
Default WHy receiver hdmi's?


"Harry Lavo" wrote in message
. ..

"trs80" wrote in message
newsnkQg.2824$rg1.2462@dukeread01...
What is the benefit of using a reciever that takes HDMI?
I see lots of discussion and concern about this.

But I not clear on the benefits a receiver provides that has HDMI?

Im my case my TV already has two HDMI inputs for DVD and DVR.
I would plan on sending coax or fiber digital to the receiver for audio.
In that case its still only a single cable to the reciever as it would be
with HDMI.

Any ideas on what the fuss is about?

thanks in advance.


If you have a high def cable box, then it can feed video and five channels
of sound into the receiver. Ditto an upconverting DVD player. Ditto a
BluRay or DVD-HD player. One cable, many channels. And then a HDMI cable
"out" of the receiver to the input of the TV. Maximum picture quality (in
theory) and maximum simplicity, with sources switched "all-at-once".


I forgot to mention that a goodly number of these HDMI-equipped receivers
also upconvert convention inputs such as S-Video, Component Video, even a
VCR's composite video output.