"Yes - this makes this sort f test rather useless in information or
enlightenment.

If I buy sme Maggie 3.6R's I has better get an amp with more cajones than
the Yamaha integrated, for instance.

If I get a Lowther horn speaker - I would do with a lot less power.

I do not see how this "challenge" serves anyone but the ego of the
"debunker"..."

And whose ego is served by restatements of the truism that various
speakers have various current demands at the extremes, which was never at
issue? Whose ego is served by inserting red herrings into the discussion?
Whose ego is served by arguing apples and oranges and distorting the
reasons for the tests being done and concluding one's purchasing decisions
have not therefore been served. And most important, whose ego is served
if one can now conclude that the ego of another is not at issue either and
can be ignored as irrelevant?