Mind Stretchers
On 6/21/2012 4:07 AM, Gary Eickmeier wrote:
On Tue Jun 19 02:20:16 2012 KH wrote:
On 6/18/2012 4:46 PM, Audio Empire wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 03:39:56 -0700, KH wrote (in
But the ability to sample a virtually endless number of
stereophonic (relative to listener reception) wavefronts, available
to an audience member, does not translate to a recording made from
any fixed perspective.
If you accept the premise, then your conclusion is correct. However
from my knowledge and experience, I find that your premise isn't
correct.
Ignoring threshold effects, I don't see how it could not be correct.
Not in the sense of different overall soundfields intertwined in the
venue, but rather different stereophonic interpretations of the overall
soundfield when evaluated from different incident angles. It's fairly
obvious that when you look ahead, look at the right wall, then look at
the left wall, the sound changes significantly.
I have told you that it doesn't work that way.
Yes, and A) you can "tell" me anything you want, but assertions lacking
data are not compelling in the least, and B) you continually misread,
misunderstand, and/or misconstrue what I write. As with:
You are setting up a new
sound field within your listening room.
A non-cogent statement interjected into a discussion about *venue* and
*recording environment*. Nothing to do with the reproduction except in
the context of what information is not captured on the recording.
Keith
|