[Scott Dorsey]

Chris Hornbeck wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:31:07 -0400, "Soundhaspriority"
wrote:

However, I seem to recall, and perhaps Scott or someone else can refresh my
memory, that someone did reasonably good quality research that established
something like a 60k sampling frequency, and 22 bits, as required for
ultimate transparency. It would be interesting to see how that author
handled the confounding variables.

Chapter 18 of Bob Katz's book _Mastering Audio_ is devoted to this
topic, and references some personal correspondence with Jim
Johnston - the original horse's mouth - and Tom Stockham's
work for the Soundstream project.

Highly recommended, for this and many other reasons. Very accessable
for folks with a deep general knowledge seeking specifics. Also,
very well written. A class act all the way around.

Yes, absolutely! And what is interesting about this is that it talks
somewhat about HOW the technology affects the required minimum sampling rate.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."