Mkuller wrote:
Steven Sullivan wrote:
Do you apply the same criterion to dealers who sell 'shameful'
high-end gear?

"Shameful" - is it pornographic or something? It's interesting that you
ascribe strong moral/religious terms to what is essentially an honorable
capitalistic enterprise. Caveat emptor.

Is conspicuous consumption - say a Mercedes in the driveway - immoral, too?
Regards,
Mike


Mr. Kuller, you snipped that sentence from its context, where
it makes obvious sense. The quote marks I used around the word
'shameful' clearly followed from Mr. Bonitz' having written
'Shame on them' in reference to high-margin high-end gear.
Your beef should be with him, not me. Yet your
reply was to me only. Shame on you. Your agenda is
showing.





--
-S.