View Single Post
  #14   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Audio Empire Audio Empire is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,193
Default LP still better than Digital?

On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 05:50:32 -0700, Arny Krueger wrote
(in article ):

"Audio Empire" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:42:09 -0700, wrote
(in article ):

On Saturday, June 16, 2012 10:31:54 AM UTC-4, Audio Empire wrote:
I can hear the howls of derision now from certain parties who post here
regularly. I'm out of my mind. There can just be no other explanation
for
it!

Actually, what you'll hear is a big yawn. Cuz we've heard it all
before, too many times.


There are some who post here regularly who have so much invested in LP
being
inferior to EVERYTHING, that those are the folks from whom I expected (and
still expect) the howls of derision.


Trust me, my investment in digital audio or just audio seriously pales
compared to the aforementioned investment in equipment with highly
questionable price/performance.

If I'm prejudiced against what he has, he must be 100 times+ more prejudiced
against what I have.


Who said I was talking about you? Besides, no one is talking about the
equipment here, the mention of which is just background - to set the stage,
as it were. The "howls of derision" would come from the premise and the
conclusion, that even a modest LP rig can outperform a $7000 - and highly
touted - DAC.