"Patrick Turner" = asinine, criminal ****wit

Phil Allison

And I maintain that just because some GOSS is wound into a spiral,
the U compared to an interleaved E&I tranny won't necessarily be
10 to 15 times what it is in the E&I lams.

** Two counter examples:

#1.

The I mag @ 240 volts for a 300 VA mains toroidal ( from Harbuch) on
the
bench is 11mA rms.

At 120 volts, I mag falls to 1.7 mA, becomes sine wave and has a 12
degree
phase angle.

The load R is effectively 70 kohms.

For this case, L computes to be over 1000 H using: L = R / (
2.pi.50.
tan 12d )

#2.

The I mag @ 240 volts for a 160 VA mains toroidal ( from Jaycar) on
the
bench is 7 mA rms.

At 120 volts, the I mag falls to 1.6 mA, becomes near sine wave and
has a
15
degree phase angle.

The load R is effectively 75 kohms.

L computes to be nearly 900 H.


You are quite right with all these calcs

** Now you do the same for E -core tannies of similar ratings - your
own
or commercial ones.

Lets compares the I mag and effective L primary figures.

Lets see if the toroidals win by 10 to 15 times.


If you want to convince us any old toroid has 15 times the inductance
for an E&I tranny using the same material and with the same Bmax, you
better get
on and do it,


** I just posted the bloody evidence - you brain dead ****.

Do similar tests using similar sized E cores and post the figures.

The I mag figures will reveal the effective inductance values being
achieved.


BTW Define your term "U" ????




Your insults don't waste my time because there is little point replying to
insults,


** No insults ever from me - but precise descriptions of the Turneroid -
one of the most evil POS on the planet.



but I have to say I thought you were so very inconsistent recently when
you
instructed me to
get bowel cancer and die,
but then you lecture Pinkerton about what you say
are his Nazi tendencies.



** Autistic morons see inconsistency where none exists.





................ Phil