Radium wrote:

What the @%#$ is this website talking about?

They are unintentionally confusing people by being plain too dumb to
specify what they actually write about because they assume it obvious.

http://telecom.hellodirect.com/docs/...l.1.051501.asp

Telephone line sound quality, within the specs for digital sound for
that use they appear imo to be correct, but they have omitted to specify
the restricted applicability.

They say:

"analog can deliver better sound quality than digital"

"Digital offers better clarity, but analog gives you richer quality."

"The advantage to analog cordless products? Well, they're a bit
cheaper. And the sound quality is richer."

"Analog's sound quality is still superior—as some users with
dual-transmission phones will manually switch to analog for better
sound when they're not concerned with a crowded coverage area"

"An analog phone will give you the richest sound quality and usually
enough range."

CC to webmaster, because they are confusing and misleading by not
specifying what they write about. There is plenty stuff that quoted out
of context would be urban myths, or plain nonsensen.


Kind regards

Peter Larsen

--
************************************************** ***********
* My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk *
************************************************** ***********