[MiNe 109]

In article ,
flipper wrote:

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:08:03 -0600, MiNe 109
wrote:

In article ,
flipper wrote:

5 is not 15.

Another winning point repeated.

I wouldn't need to if you would ever 'get it'.

By 'oopsie' I meant 'I misstated the number of years covered by the
reference'. This misstatement doesn't change the validity of the
reference nor was I making an independent argument.

Get it?

Stephen