Arny Krueger wrote:
JBorg wrote in message




Why? It's because you're attempting to compare and then collate
the results from two incongruent sources.



Here's another idiot who obvious doesn't know the difference between
collate and correlate. Probably due to a lifetime of dead-end clerical
jobs.


Shooooooo... not you. Go awayyy.


To correlate is to bring into causal, complementary, parallel, or
reciprocal relation. That is by way of saying-- to bring the
reviewer's perception into causal relation with the detailed test
measurements.

To collate is to examine and compare carefully in order to note
points of disagreement. That is, to establish and to verify the
point of differences between the reviewer's perception against the
results of the detailed test measurements. Here lies the original
poster's curiosity.

To wit: The eloquent subjective appraisals of the reviewers do
not concur with test measurements.