View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Jon Yaeger
 
Posts: n/a
Default

in article , Sampo Kolkki at
wrote on 10/7/04 9:04 PM:



ref: the previous line of this amp

So now I got officially sued on intentionally prolonging the time of the
repair, intentionally "not having been reached when the customer wanted",
and finally intentionally braking the amp myself. So the ex friend of mine
claims, that I broke the "xxx" amp for just the fun of it! And this all was
for repairing an amp "without a fee, just ´for the fun of it, only the parts
should be payed".

I will keep you posted, the court hearing (and the apparent desicion) will
be in the 17th of Nov. I will tell ya all what'd happened then.

I thank everyone, that has posted me your opinions.

Sampo



One more thought . . . In the U.S. You can bring a countersuit for a yost,
i.e. a frivolous action. Your friends lawsuit sounds both frivolous,
malicious, and an abuse of process.

Do Finnish courts provide similar relief?

Jon