On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 00:36:18 GMT, B&D wrote:

On 7/13/04 12:10 PM, in article mQTIc.69109$%_6.23803@attbi_s01, "Stewart
Pinkerton" wrote:

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:06:32 GMT, B&D wrote:

On 7/12/04 1:04 PM, in article _wzIc.62960$%_6.26489@attbi_s01, "Stewart
Pinkerton" wrote:

What I have found that dollar for dollar you can get acceptable sound
performance from a CD at a much lower price point than vinyl. Vinyl,
though, if you are willing to put up with it and spend a lot more money
gives a much more satisfying result than even a comparably well executed CD
player - but it is rather fussy and not nearly as convenient as CD's.

That's simply your personal opinion - mine is quite the reverse.

SO you think that vinyl is less expensive than CD's, less fussy than CD and
ultimately unsatisfying?

No, no, and yes, to give serious answers to your sarcasm.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering