AudioBanter.com - View Single Post

wrote:
Scott "big ego, small intellect" Wheeler wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
Howard Ferstler wrote:
MINe 109 wrote:

"Curvilinear"? Isn't that ML's way of trying to be more
Ferstler-approved by diddling the dispersion?

Actually, unless the diaphragm is changing size as it moves
back and forth, the curved shape will not allow for any
better dispersion than what we would get with a flat
diaphragm.

Guess again dimbulb.

YOU guess again, dimmestbulb: the radius of the outer (front)
grid
is
larger than the radius of the inner (rear) grid. Howard is
absolutely
correct: the diaphragm *must* be "changing size" in order for
there
to
be an increase in the horizontal dispersion (without an increase
in
distortions). This would require "perfect elasticity" of the
diaphragm
material over it's excursion.

Wheeler, without addressing the issue, scrawls:

OK you are as dumb as Ferstler. Congradulations.

Did you "gratuade" high school, dim-dim?

Did you ever in your life move out of your parent's home and support
yourself?

BTW, do tell *where* Ferstler is wrong about the dispersion issue.
And
save the insults for when you are standing in front of a mirror.

Not very bright are you? Go back and reread what Ferstler said and then
figure out why he was being an idiot. Do you always agree with the
idiots?

Scott Wheeler