Arny Krueger wrote:
wrote:
Scott "big ego, small intellect" Wheeler wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
Howard Ferstler wrote:
MINe 109 wrote:
"Curvilinear"? Isn't that ML's way of trying to be more
Ferstler-approved by diddling the dispersion?
Actually, unless the diaphragm is changing size as it moves
back and forth, the curved shape will not allow for any
better dispersion than what we would get with a flat
diaphragm.
Guess again dimbulb.
YOU guess again, dimmestbulb: the radius of the outer (front)
grid
is larger than the radius of the inner (rear) grid. Howard is
absolutely correct: the diaphragm *must* be "changing size" in
order for there to be an increase in the horizontal dispersion
(without an increase in distortions). This would require "perfect
elasticity" of the diaphragm material over it's excursion.
Wheeler, without addressing the issue, scrawls:
OK you are as dumb as Ferstler. Congradulations.
Just when it seemed that Middius had taught Scotty to spell, he
upchucks one of these.
Did you "gratuade" high school, dim-dim?
Don't they usually require a High School diploma to enter
hairdresser's school?
I don't know. Never been there. Do they require a degree from a third
tier college to sit on your ass all day in front of a computer while
you sponge off your wife for a living?
BTW, do tell *where* Ferstler is wrong about the dispersion issue.
Indeed.
OK you are just as stupid as the first two losers. Maybe you should go
back and reread what Ferstler said in the first place.
And save the insults for when you are standing in front of a
mirror.
When Scott gets cornered he does the Middius dissemble-matic shuffle,
and starts slinging personal insults far and wide.
This coming from the guy who calls people pedophiles when he gets
buried in an argument about audio.
Scott Wheeler